6
Braz Dent Sci 2023 Apr/Jun;26 (2): e3769
Almheiri ARSA et al.
Influence of traverse and waveone gold glider glide path files on the amount of apically extruded debris
Almheiri ARSA et al.
Influence of traverse and waveone gold glider glide path files
on the amount of apically extruded debris
activation techniques using confocal laser scanning microscopy.
An in vitro study. Saudi Endod J. 2020;10(3):247-53.
2. Gunes B, Yesildal Yeter K. Effects of different glide path files
on apical debris extrusion in curved root canals. J Endod.
2018;44(7):1191-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.012.
PMid:29884338.
3. Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Akpek F, Topçuoğlu G, Akti A. Influence
of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal
preparation using single-file systems in curved canals. Int Endod
J. 2016;49(6):599-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12484.
PMid:26084620.
4. Seracchiani M, Donfrancesco O, Relucenti M, Reda R, Zanza A,
Gambarini G,etal. In vitro evaluation of a recently developed rotary
file: af rotary. Braz Dent Sci. 2021;24(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/
bds.2021.v24i4.2558.
5. Gambarini G, Miccoli G, D’Angelo M, Seracchiani M, Obino FV,
Reda R,etal. The relevance of operative torque and torsional
resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A preliminary
clinical investigation. Saudi Endod J. 2020;10(3):260-4.
6. Kerr Dental. Traverse
TM
Rotary Glide Path File: own the glide path
[Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.
kerrdental.com/kerr-endodontics/traverse-shape#features
7. Elsewify TM, Saber SM, Plotino G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of
three heat-Treated nickel-Titanium instruments at simulated
body temperature. Saudi Endod J. 2020;10(2):131-6. http://dx.doi.
org/10.4103/sej.sej_122_19.
8. Dentsply Sirona. WaveOne Gold Glider File [Internet]. 2022 [cited
2022 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.dentsplysirona.com/
en-hk/shop/waveone-gold-glider-file.html
9. El Hamid HMA. Comparative study of the effect of using glide path
files on apical extrusion of debris during root canals preparation
with different rotary systems: an in vitro study. ASDJ J. 2017;20:349-
55.
10. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible
statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and
biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146. PMid:17695343.
11. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and
curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1. PMid:5284110.
12. Shaker A, Rikab MS, Alharissy M. Effect of a glide path with rotary
files on apical extrusion of intra-canal debris during root canal
preparation using a reciproc system: an in vitro study. J Int Dent
Med Res. 2019;4:1263-7.
13. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris
extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master
techniques. J Endod. 1991;17(6):275-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0099-2399(06)81866-2. PMid:1940753.
14. Abdallah MA, Zaazou AM, Mokhless NA. A comparative study of
the amount of apically extruded debris after using different types
of glide path files. Alex Dent J. 2017;42(1):80-4. http://dx.doi.
org/10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57861.
15. Pawar AM, Pawar M, Kfir A, Thakur B, Mutha P, Banga KS. Effect
of glide path preparation on apical extrusion of debris in root
canals instrumented with three single-file systems: an ex vivo
comparative study. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(2):110-4. http://dx.doi.
org/10.4103/0972-0707.212235. PMid:28855758.
16. De-Deus G, Brandão MC, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel RAS, Luna AS.
Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the singlefile
ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surgery.
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2010;110(3):390-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.020. PMid:20727500.
17. Üstün Y, Çanakçi BC, Dinçer AN, Er O, Düzgün S. Evaluation of
apically extruded debris associated with several Ni-Ti systems.
Int Endod J. 2015;48(7):701-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12369.
PMid:25112960.
18. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Seung-Jong L, Chan-Young
L. Shaping ability of three profile rotary instrumentation techniques
in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000;26(12):719-23. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013. PMid:11471641.
19. Topçuoğlu HS, Zan R, Akpek F, Topçuoğlu G, Ulusan Ö, Aktı A,etal.
Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using
Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments. Int
Endod J. 2016;49(12):1183-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12572.
PMid:26547513.
20. Altundasar E, Nagas E, Uyanik O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant
extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.
Oral Surgery. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology.
2011;112(4):e31-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.044.
PMid:21778084.
21. Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of debris
extruded apically by using protaper universal tulsa rotary system
in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1102-5. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.019. PMid:17931943.
22. Tanalp J, Güngör T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review
of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int
Endod J. 2014;47(3):211-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12137.
PMid:23711187.
23. Tanalp J, Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Bayirl G. Quantitative
evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3
different rotary instrumentation systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2006;101(2):250-7. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.002. PMid:16448929.
24. Ha JH, Kim SK, Kwak SW, El Abed R, Bae YC, Kim HC. Debris
extrusion by glide-path establishing endodontic instruments with
different geometries. J Dent Sci. 2016;11(2):136-40. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.03.002. PMid:30894961.
25. Anshida VP, Sudhanva ME, Vikram R, Gowda VS. A comparative
assessment of apical debris extrusion by various glide path
establishing endodontic instruments: an in vitro study. Saudi Endod
J. 2021;11(2):235-9.
26. Rabea S, Hussein Kamel W, Nour El Din M, Farouk Sharaf N.
Comparison of apically extruded debris produced by waveone
gold and protaper next after using mechanical or manual glide
path techniques. Int J Adv Res (Indore). 2019;7(12):1062-71. http://
dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10255.
27. Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, Keleş A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of
reciproc blue, reciproc, and waveone gold reciprocating instruments.
J Endod. 2017;43(8):1360-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
joen.2017.03.036. PMid:28662877.
28. Arslan H, Doğanay E, Alsancak M, Çapar ID, Karataş E, Gündüz
HA. Comparison of apically extruded debris after root canal
instrumentation using Reciproc® instruments with various
kinematics. Int Endod J. 2016;49(3):307-10. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1111/iej.12449. PMid:25809717.
29. Al-Omari MAO, Dummer PMH. Canal blockage and debris extrusion
with eight preparation techniques. J Endod. 1995;21(3):154-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80443-7. PMid:7561660.
30. Adıgüzel M, Capar ID. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance
of waveone and waveone gold small, primary, and large
instruments. J Endod. 2017;43(4):623-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
joen.2016.11.021. PMid:28216272.
31. Xavier F, Nevares G, Romeiro MK, Gonçalves K, Gominho L,
Albuquerque D. Apical extrusion of debris from root canals using
reciprocating files associated with two irrigation systems. Int
Endod J. 2015;48(7):661-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12362.
PMid:25088222.
32. Fontana CE, Ferraresso GM, Derigi LP, Pinheiro GRB, Trevensoli VC,
Bueno CES,etal. Analysis of the influence of different kinematic
instrumentation in extrusion of apical debris. Int J Adv Eng Res Sci.
2020;7(8):9-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.78.2.