UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA
JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO”
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia
Campus de São José dos Campos
ORIGINAL ARTICLE DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3847
1
Braz Dent Sci 2023 Oct/Dec; 26 (4): e3847
Potential effect of platelet rich fibrin prepared under different
centrifugation protocols on stem cells from the apical papilla
O potencial efeito da fibrina rica em plaquetas preparada sob diferentes protocolos de centrifugação nas células
tronco da papila apical
Lina Samir SHALABY
1,2
, Sahar SHAWKAT
2
, Iman FATHY
3
1 - Newgiza University, School of Dentistry, Oral Biology Department, Giza, Egypt.
2 - Cairo University, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral Biology Department, Cairo, Egypt.
3 - Ain Shams University, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral Biology Department, Cairo, Egypt.
How to cite: Shalaby LS, Shawkat S, Fathy I. Potential effect of platelet rich brin prepared under different centrifugation protocols on
stem cells from the apical papilla. Braz Dent Sci. 2023;26(4):e3847. https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3847
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The present work was designed to evaluate the proliferation and differentiation potential of stem
cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) seeded along with platelet rich brin (PRF) scaffolds prepared under two
different centrifugation protocols. Materials and Methods: Standard and advanced PRF protocols were used.
Cells were divided into 4 groups: negative control, positive control, standard (L-PRF) and advanced (A-PRF)
groups. Cell count and cell viability assays were carried out to assess the proliferation capacity. Alizarin red S
(ARS) stain, Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL)
immunouorescence staining were used to evaluate the osteogenic potential in the differentiated cells. Results:
Both types of platelet rich brin increased the cell count, cell viability with no cytotoxicity that was reected on
increased proliferation and differentiation in terms of the performed tests. Conclusion: A-PRF group showed
signicant increase in proliferation and differentiation potentials compared to L-PRF group.
KEYWORDS
Alkaline phosphatase; Centrifugation; Platelet rich brin; RANKL ligand; Stem cells.
RESUMO
Objetivo: Este estudo objetivou avaliar o potencial proliferativo e de diferenciação das células tronco da papila
cultivadas conjuntamente com brina rica em plaquetas (PRF) preparados sob dois protocolos de centrifugação
distintos. Material e Métodos: Protocolos padrão e avançado de PRF foram utilizados. As células foram
divididas em 4 grupos: controle negativo, controle positivo, padrão (L-PRF) e avançado (A-PRF). A contagem
de células e ensaio de viabilidade foram realizados para vericar a capacidade proliferativa. Coloração
vermelho de alizarina S, atividade de fosfatase alcalina e imunouorescência para o receptor ativador do fator
nuclear kappa-B (RANKL) foram utilizados para avaliar o potencial osteogênico e de diferenciação celular.
Resultados: Ambos os tipos de PRF aumentaram o número de células, viabilidade celular sem toxicidade o que
reetiu no aumento da proliferação e diferenciação de acordo com os testes realizados. Conclusão: O grupo
A-PRF aumentou signicativamente a proliferação e diferenciação comparado com o grupo L-PRF.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE
Células-tronco; Centrifugação; Fibrina rica em plaquetas; Fosfatase alcalina; RANKL.
2
Braz Dent Sci 2023 Oct/Dec; 26 (4): e3847
Shalaby et al.
Different centrifugation protocols of PRF on SCAP
Shalaby et al.
Different centrifugation protocols of PRF on SCAP
INTRODUCTION
Dental trauma and caries both of which are
prevalent dental problems that leads to pulp
exposure, infection and necrosis. Under these
conditions, endodontic treatment is the most
common clinical treatment through which the
dental pulp is removed. In pediatric dentistry
and endodontics, the management of immature
permanent teeth remains a challenge. As once
the tooth lost its vitality, the root development
halts, leaving behind a weak tooth that unable to
withstand the normal physiological masticatory
forces. The consequences will be a high rate
of root fracture with poor prognosis in the
medium to the long term. Most of the studies
revealed that, teeth were lost in the rst 10 years
following trauma, despite being endodontically
treated in more than 50% of cases [1]. Tissue
engineering has been a topic of extensive
research over the past decade, involves a triad
(stem cells, scaffold and growth factors), aiming
to form a new tissue to restore the anatomy
and function as the original one. Regenerative
endodontic techniques (RETs) have been
recently introduced with the ultimate goal
of stimulating further root development and
thickening of root dentinal walls [2]. Stem-cell
biology has become an important eld for the
understanding of tissue regeneration. A variety
of dental MSCs have been isolated including stem
cells from bone marrow (BMSCs), dental pulp
(DPSCs), exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED),
periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs),
dental follicle precursor cells (DFPCs), stem cells
from apical papilla (SCAP) and gingiva- derived
mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs). SCAP
are particularly relevant and significant in
regenerative endodontic procedures since they
are the cells suggested to populate the root
canal area following regenerative endodontics.
Hence, they should be targeted for maximum
benet of stem cell research and translational
medicine [3].
Platelets, isolated from a peripheral blood,
showed the ability of concentrated platelets to
provide 6–8 times supraphysiological doses of
growth factors. Earlier studies, demonstrated
the ability of several key growth factors, found
in platelets, to stimulate the recruitment and
differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and
other target cells which markedly support tissue
regeneration [4]. The Platelet rich plasma
(PRP) was introduced to the world of dentistry
in 1997 by Whitman and co-workers. It was
suggested that PRP can attract stem cells from
surrounding periapical tissues. PRP was referred
as a first-generation platelet concentrate,
followed by the platelet rich brin (PRF) as a
second-generation platelet concentrate that was
developed rst by Choukroun et al. in 2001 and
the third- generation, called concentrated growth
factors (CGF) that was developed and described
in 2006 by Sacco [5].
Since PRF introduction in 2001, various
protocols utilizing the low-speed centrifugation
concept for PRF preparation, such as advanced
platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) and injectable
platelet rich brin (i-PRF), have been proposed
with different amounts of growth factors
and other biomolecules necessary for tissue
regeneration and wound healing. The alteration
in centrifugation parameters, such as speed
and time, was showed to have a direct impact
on growth factors release within the PRF
matrix [4,5]. However, reference data about
potential effect of centrifugation parameters
modication on PRF matrix and its impact on
tissues regeneration still not properly covered
and needs further research. Hence, the present
work was designed to evaluate the proliferation
and differentiation potential of the stem cells
from apical papilla seeded along with platelet
rich brin scaffolds prepared under two different
centrifugation protocols which are standard and
advanced/ Low speed centrifugation concept
(LSCC) protocols.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Stem cells isolation, characterization and culture
This study was approved by the research
ethics committees Faculty of Dentistry Cairo
University, number 19515. All experiments were
performed in accordance with the committee
guidelines of the stem cells experiment.
The current study was performed by using
human sound impacted third molars (n=12)
collected from healthy young patients
(18 to 21 years old) with incompletely formed
roots. The extracted teeth were immediately
rinsed with sterile PBS (PH 7.4) and transferred
in transfer solution (PBS + 10000 U penicillin/
streptomycin + preservative media) until being
transferred to the laboratory for further work.
3
Braz Dent Sci 2023 Oct/Dec; 26 (4): e3847
Shalaby et al.
Different centrifugation protocols of PRF on SCAP
Shalaby et al.
Different centrifugation protocols of PRF on SCAP
Patient recruitment
The current study was performed by
using human sound impacted third molars
(n=12) collected from healthy young patients
(18 to 21 years old) in the Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery Department, Ain Shams University.
Patient’s inclusion criteria were:
- Age ranges from 18 to 21 years old
- Sex, males and females
- Medically t and well
- Has the capacity to give an informed
consent
- Partially sound or fully impacted wisdom
teeth with incompletely formed roots
Patient’s exclusion criteria were:
- Radiographic examination showed
completely formed roots
- Carious wisdom teeth
- Strategic tooth or not causing harm
during or upon its eruption
Patients were informed about the nature of
the study, and they were asked to sign an
informed consent.
The blood sample was collected later from
another adult healthy volunteer with normal
blood picture.
Isolation of SCAP
Apical papilla (soft tissue loosely attached
to the apices of incompletely formed roots) was
detached with a pair of forceps. Tissue obtained
from apical papillae of all teeth were mixed all
together. SCAP were isolated from this tissue
using enzymatic digestion method.
Characterization of SCAP
Characterization was done using flow
cytometric analysis. The immunoassaying
stains [CD45-PC5 (Phycoerythrin Cynin),
CD44-FITC (uorescein Isothiocyanate) and
CD73-PE (phycoerythrin)] were used to label
the isolated cells.
Culture Protocol of SCAP
The cells were cultured in T-75 culture
ask, in complete culture media (Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco,
Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum
(FBS) (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin
(Gibco). Flask was incubated at 37 °C in an
atmosphere of 5% CO2. The media was changed
every 24 hours. When the cells reached 80%
confluency, the cells were harvested and
passaged. Cells from the 3rd passage were used
in the following assays.
PREPARATION TECHNIQUES OF PRF
A sample of blood was collected from an adult
healthy volunteer with normal blood picture in a
plain glass tube “without anticoagulants”, then
immediately centrifuged at room temperature
(20-25ºC) to prepare the PRF gel according to the
selected protocols in the current study design [6]
as follows:
Standard Leucocytes PRF (L-PRF), sterile
plain glass-based vacuum tubes (10 ml;
2700 rpm for 12 minutes).
Advanced PRF (A-PRF), sterile plain
glass-based vacuum tubes (10 ml; 1500
rpm for 14 minutes).
SEEDING OF THE SCAP AND GROUPING:
Seeding of the SCAP in the different groups
was done according to the study design for
7 days for osteogenic differentiation [7,8], into
4 different groups as follows;
1. Negative control (NC): SCAP + conventional
culture media*
2. Positive control (PC): SCAP + osteogenic
culture media (OM)**
3. Leukocyte PRF (L-PRF): SCAP + OM + L-PRF
4. Advanced PRF (A-PRF): SCAP + OM + A-PRF
* Conventional culture media: (Dulbecco’s
modied Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco,
Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine
serum (FBS) (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/
streptomycin (Gibco).
** Osteogenic culture media (OM): low
glucose DMEM containing 10% fetal
bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/
streptomycin, 50ng/ml Ascorbic acid
and 10mM β-Glycerophosphate (Gibco,
Thermosientic, Germany).
4
Braz Dent Sci 2023 Oct/Dec; 26 (4): e3847
Shalaby et al.
Different centrifugation protocols of PRF on SCAP
Shalaby et al.
Different centrifugation protocols of PRF on SCAP
ASSESSMENT METHODS
Proliferation assessment
Cell counting ‘Trypan blue’ by Hemocytometer
The cells were counted by automated
hemocytometer to estimate the total number
of cells according to the following protocol [7].
The samples were loaded as suspension on
hemocytometer and observed. Nonviable cells
were stained; however, the viable cells did not
take up the stain.
Assessment of cell viability by cell cytotoxicity and
proliferation assay (MTT)
MTT assay was used to monitor the response
and health of cells in culture. The optical density
was assayed by spectrophotometer. The cell
cytotoxicity assay was performed according to
manufacturer instructions using the Vybrant®
Methyl-tetra-zolium (MTT; 3-(4, 5 dimethylthiazol-
2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) Cell
Proliferation Assay Kit, cat no: M6494 (Thermo
Fisher, Germany).
Differentiation assessment
Assessment of inorganic deposition using Alizarin
red S (ARS) stain
ARS stain was used to assess the deposition of
inorganic content in differentiated SCAP, according
to the following protocol [9]. The microscopic
examination was performed by LABOMED
microscope with suitable magnication, cat no:
9126000; USA. Then the area fraction percentage
was calculated. The staining intensity was scored
according to a fourtier system: 0, no staining; 1+,
weak; 2+, moderate; and 3+, strong. In brief,
the H-score of each sample was calculated as
the sum of each intensity (0-3) multiplied by the
percentage of positive cells (0-100%). The score
ranged from 0-300. The median value of H-score
was calculated.
Assessment of Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity
The Alkaline phosphatase activity was
measured according to manufacturer instructions
in supernatant of differentiated SCAP using an
ALP assay kit (Sigma)® with para-nitrophenyl
phosphate (p-NPP) as substrate. 100 µL of
each p-nitrophenol standard and 50 µL of
each test sample was added to a 96-well plate.
After incubation at 37 ºC the absorbance was
measured immediately at 405 nm using a on a
spectrophotometer using an ELx800 absorbance
microplate reader (ELx 800; Bio-Tek Instruments
Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). A standard curve of
absorbance versus concentration was generated
and used to determine the ALP activity (U/L).
Assessment of RANKL expression in SCAP using
immunouorescence staining
Cells from different groups were harvested
and cultured for 24 hours on cover slips and
examined for the expression of Receptor activator
of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL) for
SCAP using specic polyclonal antibody [10].
The microscopic examination was performed
by LABOMED Fluorescence microscope with
suitable magnication, cat no: 9126000; USA.
The immunouorescence (IF) staining intensity
was scored according to a fourtier system: 0,
no staining; 1+, weak; 2+, moderate; and 3+,
strong. In brief, the H-score of each sample
was calculated as the sum of each intensity
(0-3) multiplied by the percentage of positive
cells (0-100%). The score ranged from 0-300.
The median value of H-score was calculated.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHOD
All experiments were performed in triplicate.
All assays were repeated three times to ensure
reproducibility. Data were analysed using the
GraphPad prism version 9.3.1. (San Diego, US)
and used also for graph plotting. Each value
represents the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Statistical significance was determined using
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed
by multiple comparison Tukey’s post-hoc test
to explore differences between multiple groups
means while controlling the experiment-wise
error rate. P-value: level of significance,
a p-value 0.05: means statistically insignicant,
p-value < 0.05 mean statistically significant,
p-value < 0.01: high statistically signicant.
RESULTS
Cell characterization (Flow cytometry)
Characterization of the isolated cells via
immunoassaying with stem cell markers CD44,
CD73 versus CD45 using ow cytometry revealed
that most of the cells showed double bright