One Year Clinical Evaluation of E-max Press Crowns Retained with Fiber Reinforced Composite Post Versus E-max Press Endocrowns in Anterior Endodontically Treated Teeth (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2021.v24i2.2413Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess patient satisfaction, gross fracture and marginal adaptation of e.max press endocrowns versus e.max press crowns retained with Fiber reinforced composite post (FRCP) and core in upper anterior teeth. Material and methods: The present study included 24 patients seeking root canal treatment in anterior upper arch. The patients received root canal treatment (RCT) then they were randomly assigned into two groups (n=12). The first group received preparation for the IPS e.max crowns retained with FRCP and core and the second group received preparation for the IPS e.max endocrowns. Press technique was used for the fabrication of both restorations using IPS e.max press ingots. Marginal integrity and gross fracture were evaluated using USPHS criteria and a questionnaire was conducted to evaluate patient satisfaction. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Results: There was no statistical significant difference regarding gross fracture of both groups after 12 months (p-value = 0.093, Effect size = 0.447), meanwhile; group 1 was statistically significantly higher than group 2 regarding marginal integrity (p-value = 0.037, Effect size = 0.513). Regarding patient satisfaction FRCP and core group showed statistical significant higher satisfaction than endocrown group (p-value = 0.047, Effect size = 0.447). Conclusion: E.max press endocrowns revealed successful performance similar to e.max press crowns retained with FRCP in terms of gross fracture, however better marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction was obtained with e.max press crowns retained with FRC post and core group.
Keywords
Anterior teeth; Endocrown; Endodontically treated teeth; Fiber Post; E.max.
References
Papalexopoulos D, Filippatos G. Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth: From Immediate Restorations to the. Reverse” Preparation Approach”. EC Dental Science. 2019; 18:2159-68.
Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth. Dental Traumatology. 1994 Apr;10(2):91-3.
Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? Journal of endodontics. 1992 Jul 1;18(7):332-5.
Bonchev A, Radeva E, Tsvetanova N. Fiber Reinforced Composite Posts–A Review of Literature. Int J Sci Res. 2017;6(10):1887-93.
Irmaleny Z, Ardjanggi S, Mardiyah AA, Wahjuningrum DA. Endocrown restoration on postendodontics treatment on lower first molar. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 2019 May;9(3):303.
Sherfudhin H, Hobeich J, Carvalho CA, Aboushelib MN, Sadig W, Salameh Z. Effect of different ferrule designs on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and all-ceramic crowns. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2011 Feb;19(1):28-33.
Hamdy A. Effect of full coverage, endocrowns, onlays, inlays restorations on fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars. of. 2015; 5:2.
Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry: PPAD. 1995;7(5):83-94.
Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years-preliminary results. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 1999 Sep 1; 1:255-66.
Ghajghouj O, Taşar-Faruk S. Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Endocrowns with Different Intracoronal Depths and Restorative Materials Luted with Various Resin Cements. Materials. 2019 Jan;12(16):2528.
El Ghoul WA, Özcan M, Ounsi H, Tohme H, Salameh Z. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2020 Jan 1;123(1):128-34.
Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Operative dentistry. 2012 Mar;37(2):130-6.
Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2017 May 1;117(5):646-55.
Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2013 Dec;25(6):383-90.
Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1994 Jun 1;71(6):565-7.
Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D, Valentino B, Ferrari M, Aversa R, Apicella A. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dental Materials. 2006 Nov 1;22(11):1035-44.
Elagra ME. Endocrown preparation: Review. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences 2019; 5(1): 253-256.
Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence International. 2008 Feb 1;39(2).
Dejak B, Młotkowski A. Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2018;62(2):171-6.
Baruah K, Mirdha N, Gill B, Bishnoi N, Gupta T, Baruah Q. Comparative study of the effect on apical sealability with different levels of remaining gutta-percha in teeth prepared to receive posts: An in vitro study. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S261.
Alencar AH, Dummer PM, Oliveira HC, Pécora JD, Estrela C. Procedural errors during root canal preparation using rotary NiTi instruments detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Brazilian dental journal. 2010;21(6):543-9.
Thompson SA. An overview of nickel–titanium alloys used in dentistry. International endodontic journal. 2000 Jul;33(4):297-310.
Khandelwal D, Ballal NV. RECENT ADVANCES IN ROOT CANAL SEALERS. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2016 Jul 1;9(3).
Nagas E, Karaduman E, Sahin C, Uyanik O, Canay S. Effect of timing of post space preparation on the apical seal when using different sealers and obturation techniques. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2016 Mar 1;11(1):79-82.
Carvalho MA, Lazari PC, Gresnigt M, Del Bel Cury AA, Magne P. Current options concerning the endodontically-treated teeth restoration with the adhesive approach. Brazilian oral research. 2018;32.
Al-Sayed HD, Al-Resayes SS, Jamjoom FZ, Al-Sowygh ZH. The effect of various core build-up materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials. King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences. 2013 Jul 1;4(2):71-5.
Chiluka L, Shastry YM, Gupta N, Reddy KM, Prashanth NB, Sravanthi K. An in vitro Study to evaluate the effect of eugenol-free and eugenol-containing temporary cements on the bond strength of resin cement and considering time as a factor. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 2017 Jul;7(4):202-207.
Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N, Hochstedler JL, Mohamed SE, Billiot S, Mercante DE. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide–based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: A prospective clinical pilot study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2006 Oct 1;96(4):237-44.
Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients' satisfaction with dental esthetics. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2007 Jun 1;138(6):805-8.
Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC oral health. 2011 Dec 1;11(1):6.
Halawani SM, Al-Harbi SA. Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics. International Journal of Medicine in Developing Countries. 2017; 1(2): 78-84.
Gaintantzopoulou MD, El-Damanhoury HM. Effect of preparation depth on the marginal and internal adaptation of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture endocrowns. Operative dentistry. 2016 Nov;41(6):607-16.
Soliman KM, Mandor MH, El Mekkawi W. Marginal Adaptation of Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns with Different Cavity Depths and Margin Designs. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls. 2019 Apr 1;6(2):177-85.
Forberger N, Göhring TN. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2008 Oct 1;100(4):264-73.
Al-shibri S, Elguindy J. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with lithium disilicate crowns retained with fiber posts compared to lithium disilicate and cerasmart endocrowns. Dentistry 2017, 7:464.
Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005 Jan 1;18(1).
Beck N, Graef F, Wichmann M, Karl M. In vitro fracture resistance of copy-milled zirconia ceramic posts. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2010 Jan 1;103(1):40-4.
Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001 Mar;10(1):26-36.
Toksavul S, Toman M, Uyulgan B, Schmage P, Nergiz I. Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre‐fabricated post systems. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2005 Jun;32(6):433-40.
Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Giner L, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clinical oral investigations. 2014 Mar 1;18(2):545-54.
Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005 May 1;18(3).
