Microtensile test in dental research. controversial aspects in statistical analysis (experimental unit and premature failures)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2013.v16i3.869Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to present the controversial aspects in performing inferential statistical analysis with regard to selection of the experimental unit and procedures adopted in the case of pre-test failures.
Material and Method: Eighty-seven dissertations and theses in the field of dentistry were evaluated, in which microtensile testing available at three public Universities in the State of São Paulo were performed, namely: School of Dentistry, USP; School of Dentistry, Unesp (Araraquara and São José dos Campos) and the Piracicaba School of Dentistry (Unicamp).
Results: As regards the experimental unit, 34 (39.08%) theses and/or dissertations used the “stick” and 53 (60.91%) the “tooth/block” type. With regard to pre-test failures, 9 (10.34%) theses and/or dissertations attributed the value “0”, 6 (6.89%) disregarded the sticks, 2 (2.29%) attributed the minimum value of 2 MPa, 1 (1,14%) the minimum value of 4 MPa, 1 (1.14%) attributed half the minimum value of the group and 68 (78.16%) did not mention the occurrence of pre-test failures.
Conclusion: As regards the experimental unit, at present the experimental unit is considered the tooth (or ceramic bloc) and not the stick. With regard to pre-test failures, the following are considered: Attribution of a minimum bond strength value under the experimental condition or in the group considered; expressing the number and percentage of cases of failures under each experimental condition; which failures were included in the statistical analysis and making a comparison between the analysis with exclusion of the sticks and analysis without inclusion of the sticks.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
(PDF)
For all articles published in the BDS journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit. All metadata associated with published articles is released under the Creative Commons CC0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
Before the submission, authors must obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables, or any extract of a text) that does not fall into the public domain or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyright holder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyright holder).
The authors hereby attest that the study is original and does not present manipulated data, fraud, or plagiarism. All names listed made a significant scientific contribution to the study, are aware of the presented data, and agree with the final version of the manuscript. They assume complete responsibility for the ethical aspects of the study.
This text must be printed and signed by all authors. The scanned version should be submitted as supplemental file during the submission process.
