Machinability of Zirconia Toughened Mica Glass Ceramics for Dental Restorations

Authors

  • Sivaranjani Gali Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-741X
  • Suresh Chiru Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2021.v24i1.2114

Abstract

Objective: For a dental material to be machinable for CAD/CAM technology, it must offer convenient machining, under a given set of cutting conditions. Quantitative evaluation of machinability has been assessed in literature through various parameters such as tool wear, penetration rates, surface roughness, cutting force and power. A machinable ceramic will typically demonstrate a higher tool penetration rate with signs of reduced diamond tool wear and edge chipping. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the feasibility of machining an experimental ceramic, 20 wt.% zirconia reinforced mica glass ceramics (G20Z) for indirect dental restorations and compare the tool penetration rates of G20Z to commercially available dental ceramics, Presintered Zirconia (PSZ) and IPS emax CAD. Material and Methods:  Precursors of base glass (SiO2 -Al2O3 -K2O -MgO-B2O3 -F) were melted at 15000C for 2 h in a platinum crucible and quenched in deionised water. The glass frit was ball milled with 20 wt. % YSZ (G20Z) and subject to two stage heat treatment in a muffle furnace. Specimens of G20Z (12 X 2 mm) were evaluated for their feasibility of machining under varying spindle speed, depth of cut, and feed rates. Influence of depth of cut, spindle speed and feed rate (vc=8000-16000 rpm, d=0.4-0.8 mm, f=0.1- 0.3 mm/tooth) on cutting forces, material response, surface roughness and tool wear were investigated. Tool penetration rates, tool wear and margin chipping were also evaluated and compared with Pre-sintered Zirconia (PSZ)  and e.max CAD in a custom dental milling surveyor at 30,000 rpm with a load of 0.98 N under water lubrication for 6 min. Tool penetration rates were calculated as the ratio of length of cut and milling time with a measuring microscope and scanning electron microscope was used for tool wear and edge chipping. ANOVA and Tukey Kramer tests were used for statistically comparing the means of each group. Results: Spindle speed and feed rate play a significant role in influencing surface roughness, thrust force, cutting forces and tool wear. Penetration rates of G20Z (0.32 ±0.12 mm/min) was significantly greater than PSZ (0.26 ±0.06 mm/min) and IPS e.max CAD (0.21 ±0.05 mm/min). SEM observations reveal tool abrasion and edge chipping regardless of the ceramic type. Conclusion: High spindle speeds delivers low cutting forces with an average surface roughness of 1.61 µm, with abrasive wear of the tool insert and brittle fracture of zirconia mica glass ceramic composites. G20Z with its machinable nature demonstrates greater tool penetration rates than PSZ and IPS e.max CAD. Tool wear and edge chipping is seen in all the investigated ceramics.

 

Keywords

Machinability, Dental Ceramics, Mica Glass-Ceramics, Dental Zirconia, Tool penetration rates.

 

Author Biographies

Sivaranjani Gali, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore

Associate Professor

Dept of Prosthodontics 

Suresh Chiru, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore.

Professor

Dept of Mechanical Engineering 

References

Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. BDJ 2008;204:505–511.

Li RWK, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: State of the art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:208–216.

Tiu J, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Contemporary CAD / CAM Materials in Dentistry. 2019.

Chavali R, Nejat AH, Lawson NC. Machinability of CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:194–199.

Rekow ED, Erdman AG, Riley DR, et al. CAD/CAM for dental restorations-some of the curious challenges. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991;38:314–318.

Pollington S, Noort R Van. An Update of Ceramics in Dentistry. Int J Clin Dent 2009;2:283–307.

Pollington S. Novel glass-ceramics for dental restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:60–67.

Amaral M, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, et al. Low-temperature degradation of a Y-TZP ceramic after surface treatments. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2013;101:1387–1392.

Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KHK, et al. Translucency and biaxial flexural strength of four ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2008;24:1506–1511.

Rekow ED, Silva NRFA, Coelho PG, et al. Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvements. J Dent Res 2011;90:937–952.

Solá-Ruíz MF, Agustin-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, et al. A prospective evaluation of zirconia anterior partial fixed dental prostheses: Clinical results after seven years. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:578–84.

Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, et al. Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:170–177.

Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulou T, Pelekanos S, et al. Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidence-based clinical breakthrough. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:348–80.

Zahran M, El-Mowafy O, Tam L, et al. Fracture Strength and Fatigue Resistance of All-Ceramic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CADCAM Technology. J Prosthodont 2008;17:370–377.

Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M, et al. Stresses and distortions within zirconia-fixed dental prostheses due to the veneering process. Acta Biomater 2009;5:3231–3239.

Archard JF. Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces. J Appl Phys 1953;24:981–988.

Rekow ED, Silva NRFA, Coelho PG, et al. Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvements. J Dent Res 2011;90:937–52.

Denry I, Kelly JR. Emerging Ceramic-based Materials for Dentistry. J Dent Res 2014;93:1235–1242.

Fairhurst CW. Dental ceramics: the state of the science. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:78–81.

Vogel W, Holand W, Naumann K, et al. Development of machineable bioactive glass ceramics for medical uses. J Non Cryst Solids 1986;80:34–51.

Kalmodia S, Molla AR, Basu B. In vitro cellular adhesion and antimicrobial property. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010;21:1297–1309.

Xiang Q, Liu Y, Sheng X, et al. Preparation of mica-based glass-ceramics with needle-like fluorapatite. Dent Mater 2007;23:251–258.

Holand W, Beall G. Glass–Ceramic Technology. Ohio: The American Ceramic Society, 2002.

Gali S, Ravikumar K, Murthy BVS, et al. Zirconia toughened mica glass ceramics for dental restorations. Dent Mater 2018;34:e36–e45.

Dabnun MA, Hashmi MSJ, El-Baradie MA. Surface roughness prediction model by design of experiments for turning machinable glass–ceramic (Macor). J Mater Process Technol 2005;164–165:1289–1293.

Choudhury IA, El-Baradie MA. Machinability assessment of inconel 718 by factorial design of experiment coupled with response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 1999;95:30–39.

Lebon N, Tapie L, Duret F, et al. Understanding dental CAD/CAM for restorations - dental milling machines from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. Part A: chairside milling machines. undefined 2016.Available at https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Understanding-dental-CAD%2FCAM-for-restorations-from-Lebon-Tapie/8d8ea9772340b49814e942eda266d2ea8a03f28a. Accessed December 1, 2018.

Chou YK, J.Evans C. Tool wear mechanism in continous cutting of hardened tool steels. Wear 1997;212:59–65.

Basavarajappa S, Suresh R, Gaitonde VN, et al. Analysis of cutting forces and surface roughness in hard turning of AISI 4340 using multilayer coated carbide tool. Int J Mach Mach Mater 2014;16:169–185.

Sakoda S, Nakao N, Watanabe I. The effect of abrading and cutting instruments on machinability of dental ceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2018;:1–7.

Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent 2007;35:897–902.

Boccaccini AR. Machinability and brittleness of glass-ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 1997;65:302–304.

Song X, Ren H, Yin L. Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;53:78–92.

Taira M, Yamaki M. Ranking machinability of nine machinable ceramics by dental high-speed cutting tests. J Mater Sci Lett 1994;13:480–482.

Baik DS, No KS, Chun JS, et al. A comparative evaluation method of machinability for mica-based glass-ceramics. J Mater Sci 1995;30:1801–1806.

Song X-F, Yin L. Surface morphology and fracture in handpiece adjusting of a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic with coarse diamond burs. Mater Sci Eng A 2012;534:193–202.

Song X-F, Yin L. Induced damage zone in micro-fine dental finishing of a feldspathic porcelain. Med Eng Phys 2010;32:417–422.

Song X-F, Yin L. The Quantitative Effect of Diamond Grit Size on the Subsurface Damage Induced in Dental Adjustment of Porcelain Surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 2010;224:1185–1194.

Chang CW, Waddell JN, Lyons KM, et al. Cracking of Porcelain Surfaces Arising from Abrasive Grinding with a Dental Air Turbine. J Prosthodont 2011;20:613–620.

Song X-F, Yin L. Subsurface damage induced in dental resurfacing of a feldspar porcelain with coarse diamond burs. J Biomech 2009;42:355–360.

Song X-F, Yin L, Han Y-G, et al. In vitro rapid intraoral adjustment of porcelain prostheses using a high-speed dental handpiece. Acta Biomater 2008;4:414–24.

Song X-F, Yin L, Han Y-G. In-process assessment of dental cutting of a leucite-reinforced glass–ceramic. Med Eng Phys 2009;31:214–220.

Song X-F, Peng J-H, Yin L, et al. A Machining Science Approach to Dental Cutting of Glass Ceramics Using an Electric Handpiece and Diamond Burs. J Manuf Sci Eng 2013;135:011014.

Park S-W, Driscoll CF, Romberg EE, et al. Ceramic implant abutments: Cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:444–449.

Tanaka N, Khan AM, Shintani H, et al. Dental high-speed cutting of porous-machinable-ceramic/resin composites and bovine enamel. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1993;4:71–75.

Nagarajan VS, Jahanmir S. The relationship between microstructure and wear of mica-containing glass-ceramics. WEAR ELSEVIER Wear 1996;2000:76–85.

Gali S, K. R, Murthy BVS, et al. Zirconia toughened mica glass ceramics for dental restorations. Dent Mater 2018;34:e36–e45.

Gali S, K RK. Zirconia toughened mica glass ceramics for dental restorations: Wear, thermal, optical and cytocompatibility properties. Dent Mater 2019;35:1706–1717.

IIT Kharagpur (NPTEL). Manufacturing Process: II General Purpose Machine Tools. , 2007: 1-1–13.

Ferraris E, Mestrom T, Bian R, et al. Machinability investigation on high speed hard turning of ZrO 2 with PCD tools. Procedia CIRP 2012;1:500–505.

Yekta BE, Nia SH, Alizadeh P. The effect of B2O3, PbO and P2O5 on the sintering and machinability of fluormica glass–ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2005;25:899–902.

Ghasemzadeh M, Nemati A, Hamnabard Z, et al. Influence of NaF on Crystallization and Machinability of Mica Glass Ceramics. Synth React Inorganic, Met Nano-Metal Chem 2012;42:958–964.

Kawai K, Urano M, Shigeyuki Ebisu. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:664–7.

Lebon N, Tapie L, Vennat E, et al. Influence of CAD/CAM tool and material on tool wear and roughness of dental prostheses after milling. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:236–247.

Song X-F, Ren H-T, Yin L. Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;53:78–92.

Song X-F, Peng J-H, Yin L, et al. A Machining Science Approach to Dental Cutting of Glass Ceramics Using an Electric Handpiece and Diamond Burs. J Manuf Sci Eng 2013;135:011014.

Luthardt RG, Holzhüter MS, Rudolph H, et al. CAD/CAM-machining effects on Y-TZP zirconia. Dent Mater 2004;20:655–662.

Sindel J, Petschelt A, Grellner F, et al. Evaluation of subsurface damage in CAD/CAM machined dental ceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:291–295.

Gali S. Mica glass ceramics for dental restorations. Mater Technol 2018;00:1–10.

Yin L, Jahanmir S, Ives LK. Abrasive machining of porcelain and zirconia with a dental handpiece. Wear 2003;255:975–989.

Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent 2007;35:897–902.

Amat NF, Raji SL, Muchtar A, et al. Influence of Presintering Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Presintered Dental Zirconia Block. Int J Integr Eng 2018;10:68–73.

Belli R, Wendler M, de Ligny D, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater 2017;33:84–98.

Documentation S. IPS S e . m ax ® CAD- C -on Scient tific D Docu umen ntatio on. .

Filser FT. Direct Ceramic Machining of Ceramic Dental Restorations. Diss ETH No 14089 2001;:288.

Anand PSP, Arunachalam N, Vijayaraghavan L. Effect of Grinding on Subsurface modifications of Pre-Sintered Zirconia under Different Cooling and Lubrication Conditions , Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materi ... Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials E ff ect of. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;86:122–130.

Abd El-Ghany OS, Sherief AH. Zirconia based ceramics, some clinical and biological aspects: Review. Futur Dent J 2016;2:55–64.

Jacobs MS, Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:436–42.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-22

Issue

Section

Clinical or Laboratorial Research Manuscript