Effect of the polishing procedure and surface sealant application on fluoride release
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2021.v24i1.2133Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of the polishing procedure and surface sealant application on the fluoride release of restorative materials. Material and Methods: The groups were consisted of using five different restorative materials were employed: Beautifil II, GCP Glass Fill, Amalgomer CR, Zirconomer and Fuji IX GP. 30 disk-shaped specimens (8x2 mm) were prepared from each material. Each group was subdivided into three groups considering finishing procedures: Mylar strip, polishing with Super-Snap discs, G-Coat Plus application after polishing with Super-Snap discs. The amount of fluoride released into distilled water was measured using a fluoride ion-selective electrode and ion analyzer after 24 hours, followed by measurement on days 3, 7, 15, 21, and 28. Surface analysis of the materials was performed with SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) and EDS (Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy). The data were statistically analyzed using two-way repeated measure ANOVA and LSD test (p=0.05). Results: The highest amount of fluoride released was measured after the first 24 h for all materials. Beautifil II released less fluoride than other materials in all measurement periods (p<0.05). After polishing, the amount of fluoride released from all materials except Beautifil II increased (p<0.05). The application of G-Coat Plus did not impact the amount of fluoride release of any materials (p>0.05). EDS analysis showed the most percentage of oxygen in all materials. Conclusion: The polishing procedure might induce an increase in fluoride release of glass ionomer-based materials, and the application of G-Coat Plus cannot affect the amount of fluoride release.
Keywords
Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy; Fluoride; Glass ionomer cement.
References
Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials--fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):343–362. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022
Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(2):293–300. doi:10.4012/dmj.2017-161
Cury JA, de Oliveira BH, dos Santos AP, Tenuta LM. Are fluoride releasing dental materials clinically effective on caries control?. Dent Mater. 2016;32(3):323–333. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.002
Cabral MF, Martinho RL, Guedes-Neto MV, Rebelo MA, Pontes DG, Cohen-Carneiro F. Do conventional glass ionomer cements release more fluoride than resin-modified glass ionomer cements? Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(3):209–215. doi:10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.209
Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Fluoride release and mechanical properties after 1-year water storage of recent restorative glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(4):1053–1060. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1074-4
Bayrak GD, Sandalli N, Selvi-Kuvvetli S, Topcuoglu N, Kulekci G. Effect of two different polishing systems on fluoride release, surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of newly developed restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(6):424–434. doi:10.1111/jerd.12313
Jingarwar MM, Pathak A, Bajwa NK, Sidhu HS. Quantitative assessment of fluoride release and recharge ability of different restorative materials in different media: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(12):ZC31–ZC34. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2014/9985.5275
Saxena S, Tiwari S. Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis, fluoride release, and antimicrobial properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(4):366–372. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.186790
Bagheri R, Taha NA, Azar MR, Burrow MF. Effect of G-Coat Plus on the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cements. Aust Dent J. 2013;58(4):448–453. doi:10.1111/adj.12122
Rai R, Gupta R. In vitro evaluation of the effect of two finishing and polishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(6):564–567. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.120946
Pacifici E, Bossù M, Giovannetti A, La Torre G, Guerra F, Polimeni A. Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for uncooperative patients according to surface protection treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014;4(3-4):250–258.
Jost-Brinkmann PG. Effect of air polishing on the fluoride release of (resin-modified) glass ionomer cements and of a polyacid-modified composite resin. Clin Oral Investig. 1998;2(2):91–95. doi:10.1007/s007840050051
McKnight-Hanes C, Whitford GM. Fluoride release from three glass ionomer materials and the effects of varnishing with or without finishing. Caries Res. 1992;26(5):345–350. doi:10.1159/000261466
Upadhyay S, Rao A, Shenoy R. Comparison of the amount of fluoride release from nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer, conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent (Tehran). 2013;10(2):134–140.
Thanjal NK, Billington RW, Shahid S, Luo J, Hill RG, Pearson GJ. Kinetics of fluoride ion release from dental restorative glass ionomer cements: the influence of ultrasound, radiant heat and glass composition. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(2):589–595. doi:10.1007/s10856-009-3901-3
Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S, Kavrik F, Yasa B, Botsali MS. Fluoride release/recharging ability and bond strength of glass ionomer cements to sound and caries-affected dentin. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(2):226–234. doi:10.4103/1119-3077.178917
Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I. Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009;6(2):75-81.
Bansal R, Bansal T. A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZZ01]. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(8):ZC11–ZC14. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/11926.6278
Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M, Kotsanos N. Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives. [retracted in: Dent Mater J. 2015;34(3):410]. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(2):296–304. doi:10.4012/dmj.2012-144
Tiwari S, Kenchappa M, Bhayya D, et al. Antibacterial Activity and Fluoride Release of Glass-Ionomer Cement, Compomer and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-Ionomer Cement. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(4):ZC90–ZC93. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/16282.7676
Kishore G, Sai-Sankar AJ, Pratap-Gowd M, Sridhar M, Pranitha K, Sai-Krishna VS. Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Releasing Ability of Various Restorative Materials after the Application of Surface Coating Agents - An In-vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(12):ZC38–ZC41. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/21980.9047
Ugurlu M, Ozkan EE, Ozseven A. The effect of ionizing radiation on properties of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34:e005. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0005
Tiwari S, Nandlal B. Invitro Evaluation of Fluoride Release from Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Glass Ionomer with or without Protective Coating. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(4):ZC73–ZC75. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/12598.7668
Tiwari S, Nandlal B. Effect of nano-filled surface coating agent on fluoride release from conventional glass ionomer cement: an in vitro trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013;31(2):91–95. doi:10.4103/0970-4388.115703
Guedes OA, Borges AH, Bandeca MC, Nakatani MK, de Araujo Estrela CR, de Alencar AHG, et al. Chemical and structural characterization of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(1):61–67. Published 2015 Jan 1. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1636
Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou‑Antoniades M, Theodoridou‑Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y. Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent. 2000;25(1):20-5.
