Influence of abutment material on peri-implant clinical parameters: a prospective study

Authors

  • Fabiano Cortez Zanardo Dental Research Division - Department of Implant Dentistry - Guarulhos University - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil.
  • José Della Pasqua Neto Dental Research Division - Department of Implant Dentistry - Guarulhos University - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil.
  • Luiz Henrique Alves Madeira Dental Research Division - Department of Implant Dentistry - Guarulhos University - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil.
  • Jamil Awad Shibli Dental Research Division - Department of Implant Dentistry - Guarulhos University - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil.
  • Keize Távora Barbosa Dental Research Division - Department of Implant Dentistry - Guarulhos University - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil.
  • José Augusto Rodrigues Dental Research Division - Department of Restorative and Implant Dentistry - Guarulhos University - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil.
  • Alessandra Cassoni Dental Research Division - Department of Restorative and Implant Dentistry - Guarulhos University - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2014.v17i3.972

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the peri-implant clinical parameters of zirconia versus metallic abutments for standardized custom-made implantsupported single-tooth restorations. Material and Methods: Sixteen subjects received 30 dental implants on esthetic region of upper jaws. Test group had 14 implant-supported single-tooth restorations with ceramic abutment and control group had 16 restorations with metallic abutment. Peri-implant clinical parameters were recorded after 110 ± 10 days in function at six sites by each implant, in each subject. The means of clinical measures: probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL); mean of percentages of sites with visible plaque (VP), bleeding on probing (BOP) and suppuration (SU) were recorded to each subject. To verify differences between groups Mann Whitney U-test was selected PD and CAL and k-light test VP, BOP and SU. Results: One zirconia implant-supported single-tooth restoration fractured at insertion time. The mean of PD, CAL, and BOP of the samples sites were lower to test group than control (p < 0.05). There were no differences of mean levels of VP and S between test and control group (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Clinical parameters around implant-supported restorations were influenced by abutment type with better results to zirconia abutments, at least, after short time period evaluation. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Augusto Rodrigues, Dental Research Division - Department of Restorative and Implant Dentistry - Guarulhos University - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil.

Professor Adjunto IV E, da Universidade Guarulhos. Mestre e Doutor em Clínica Odontológica- área de Dentística pela Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-18

How to Cite

1.
Zanardo FC, Della Pasqua Neto J, Madeira LHA, Shibli JA, Barbosa KT, Rodrigues JA, et al. Influence of abutment material on peri-implant clinical parameters: a prospective study. BDS [Internet]. 2014 Aug. 18 [cited 2025 Aug. 20];17(3):19-25. Available from: https://bds.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/972

Issue

Section

Clinical or Laboratorial Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)